From owner-freebsd-gecko@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 21 09:48:40 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gecko@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89153BC5 for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 09:48:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F8F03A7 for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 09:48:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t0L9meiG057289 for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 09:48:40 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: gecko@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 196802] www/firefox: Crash on Wikipedia when built with clang 3.5 Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 09:48:40 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: dumbbell@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: gecko@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-gecko@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Gecko Rendering Engine issues List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 09:48:40 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196802 --- Comment #8 from Jean-Sebastien Pedron --- My understanding is that PORTREVISION targets Ports users (not packages users). Without the bug fix, Firefox builds fine; the problem occurs at runtime. Therefore, without a PORTREVISION bump, someone who built Firefox will see Firefox crash but no tool will suggest him that the port could be updated. If PORTREVISION is bumped, the user can notice that an update is available and rebuild Firefox. If the problem was a build failure, a PORTREVISION bump would not be necessary because the port would not build without the fix anyway. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.