Date: Wed, 21 Jan 1998 19:32:16 -0600 (GMT-0600) From: Victor Manuel Carranza Gonzalez <victor@usac.edu.gt> To: Doug White <dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu> Cc: FreeBSD Questions mailing list <questions@freefall.freebsd.org> Subject: Re: ld.so and 3.0-SNAP Message-ID: <Pine.OSF.3.96.980121192218.23265A-100000@ns.usac.edu.gt> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980121135946.5192B-100000@gdi.uoregon.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 21 Jan 1998, Doug White wrote: > You need to reinstall the related package/port. Which library was > reported missing? One of them was libtermcap.so.2.1 In fact, I found that the missing libraries were the ones with names ending with .2.1, and there were similar ones in the system, but named xxxx.so.3.0, so I made a soft link with the xxx.so.2.1 name and it worked fine, but I'm sure this is not the real solution... By the way, the Pine package was installed from the same 3.0-SNAP CD. Is it advisable to use the soft-link method with all future "missing library" errors? It did never happen before with my 2.1.x and 2.2.5 boxes. Thanks, Victor
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.OSF.3.96.980121192218.23265A-100000>