From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 21 14:18:28 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C3BB16A41B for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 14:18:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E8BF13C4D9 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 14:18:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 536212082; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 15:18:19 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Tests: AWL X-Spam-Learn: disabled X-Spam-Score: -0.2/3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on tim.des.no Received: from ds4.des.no (des.no [80.203.243.180]) by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC6C9207E; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 15:18:18 +0100 (CET) Received: by ds4.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 9919D8449D; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 15:18:18 +0100 (CET) From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= To: Wes Peters References: <20080120120016.6EBDA16A4DF@hub.freebsd.org> <9019C94F-5618-44F3-9590-D63C19A36B60@opensail.org> Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 15:18:18 +0100 In-Reply-To: <9019C94F-5618-44F3-9590-D63C19A36B60@opensail.org> (Wes Peters's message of "Sun\, 20 Jan 2008 22\:54\:28 -0800") Message-ID: <86bq7fntxx.fsf@ds4.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.1 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ident daemon: oIdentd creating a lot of processes X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 14:18:28 -0000 Wes Peters writes: > Fabian Wenk writes: > > Is there a reason why you do not use the identd from FreeBSD itself? > Alternativey, use 'liedentd' from ports and it won't give away > information about your users. It also won't create any additional > processes - I promise. uh, inetd's own identd can also be configured to not reveal any information, and doesn't create any additional processes either, so what's your upside? DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no