From owner-freebsd-chat Tue Mar 4 07:26:51 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id HAA26389 for chat-outgoing; Tue, 4 Mar 1997 07:26:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from thelab.hub.org (hal-ns1-37.netcom.ca [207.181.94.101]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id HAA26384 for ; Tue, 4 Mar 1997 07:26:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from thelab.hub.org (LOCALHOST [127.0.0.1]) by thelab.hub.org (8.8.5/8.8.2) with SMTP id LAA21570; Tue, 4 Mar 1997 11:26:34 -0400 (AST) Date: Tue, 4 Mar 1997 11:26:34 -0400 (AST) From: The Hermit Hacker To: Charles Henrich cc: "Jordan K. Hubbard" , freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd.org vs vex.net In-Reply-To: <199703041510.KAA02794@crh.cl.msu.edu> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-chat@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Tue, 4 Mar 1997, Charles Henrich wrote: > >> Well I was hoping the core would officially endorse it, and if you'll note a > > > large number of the large sites are made of up FreeBSD folk anywho, who > > > presumably would switch. > > > > I'd certainly be willing to support it myself, and champion it in > > core. Someone would have to take on the organizational role that the > > folks at vex.net currently perform now, however, and most core members > > are also too busy to take on new stuff. > > Well I could easily put together a set of web pages like at vex, I'll do this > if we expect this to happen.. > Well, if we have another 9 of these to do *after* the 56byte one, I'd saw start building now, get appropriate announcements out about what is going on, maybe get an appropriate rsacrack@freebsd.org mailing list setup so that we can keep abreast of when the next one starts, get some sort of mention put up on the FreeBSD WWW pages... I only found out about this a few days into it, and then, only because Brian happened to post something here abuot it...*shrug* I don't know how many FreeBSD related hosts we have out there now, but i imagine there is enough out there that we could give linuxorg.net a good run for their money, no?