From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 9 22:32:21 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2DC21065672 for ; Mon, 9 May 2011 22:32:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F3548FC0A for ; Mon, 9 May 2011 22:32:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p49MWKdl046678 for ; Mon, 9 May 2011 16:32:20 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) with ESMTP id p49MWKKi046675 for ; Mon, 9 May 2011 16:32:20 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 16:32:20 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Mon, 09 May 2011 16:32:21 -0600 (MDT) Subject: xfce4.8 without hal X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 May 2011 22:32:21 -0000 HAL doesn't really seem to provide anything to xfce4.8, so I've been running without it enabled. Aside from an annoying "WB: pre-dbus shutdown" warning on logout, it works fine. Is there any way to avoid that error? Or is there any reason to still enable hal?