From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Dec 18 14:32: 6 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from turtle.looksharp.net (cc360882-d.strhg1.mi.home.com [24.13.43.207]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B210337B405 for ; Tue, 18 Dec 2001 14:32:04 -0800 (PST) Received: by turtle.looksharp.net (Postfix, from userid 1003) id C8A923ED0; Tue, 18 Dec 2001 17:33:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turtle.looksharp.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5BB8BAA9; Tue, 18 Dec 2001 17:33:48 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2001 17:33:48 -0500 (EST) From: "Brandon D. Valentine" To: Mike Bristow Cc: Subject: Re: Found NFS data corruption bug... (was Re: NFS: How to make FreeBSD fall on its face in one easy step ) In-Reply-To: <20011218120531.A97576@lindt.urgle.com> Message-ID: <20011218173212.I9162-100000@turtle.looksharp.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 18 Dec 2001, Mike Bristow wrote: >I suspect that the background fsck[1] that's available in FreeBSD-current >fits the bill just as well as JFS or XFS - and I'll also bet that it'll >be available in a FreeBSD-release before I'd trust data to a port of >JFS or XFS. This is a killer feature. Has anyone decided whether snapshots and background fsck will ever be backported to the RELENG_4 branch or are they destined for 5.0? Brandon D. Valentine -- "Iam mens praetrepidans avet vagari." - G. Valerius Catullus, Carmina, XLVI To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message