From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 3 17:10:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8164C16A4E2; Thu, 3 Aug 2006 17:10:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from deischen@freebsd.org) Received: from mail.ntplx.net (mail.ntplx.net [204.213.176.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 019A243D49; Thu, 3 Aug 2006 17:10:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from deischen@freebsd.org) Received: from sea.ntplx.net (sea.ntplx.net [204.213.176.11]) by mail.ntplx.net (8.13.7/8.13.7/NETPLEX) with ESMTP id k73HAI0a028988; Thu, 3 Aug 2006 13:10:18 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 13:10:18 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Eischen X-X-Sender: eischen@sea.ntplx.net To: Maxim Sobolev In-Reply-To: <44D22C7A.8030204@sippysoft.com> Message-ID: References: <44D12AC0.90009@sippysoft.com> <0C6ADBC1-E3DF-47D1-AA77-EA9BD14E059F@xcllnt.net> <44D22C7A.8030204@sippysoft.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS and Clam AntiVirus (mail.ntplx.net) Cc: "current@freebsd.org" , freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Looks like threading is b0rken on FreeBSD/powerpc X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Eischen List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2006 17:10:22 -0000 On Thu, 3 Aug 2006, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > Daniel Eischen wrote: >> On Wed, 2 Aug 2006, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: >> >>> >>> On Aug 2, 2006, at 3:44 PM, Maxim Sobolev wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Apparently threading is b0rken on the FreeBSD/powerpc - csup(8) dumps >>>> core with seg 11. The same csup(8) version compiled on 6.0 works just >>>> fine on the same 7-CURRENT kernel. >> >> AFAIK, libpthread/KSE isn't quite there yet for powerpc. > > Do you have any idea about what's wrong with it? By the way, the same problem > affects ia64 too (ia64/91846) and it has been working in 6.0 just file. Looks > like it has something to do with the thread-local storage. No, I've no idea. Nothing's changed that I know of. I'm surprised that it (powerpc libpthread) works! I know some supporting MD bits were added to libpthread but never knew that they actually worked :) Has the compiler changed recently? -- DE