From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 7 22:06:30 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 198F716A4CE; Sun, 7 Mar 2004 22:06:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from white.imgsrc.co.jp (ns.imgsrc.co.jp [210.226.20.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F5AA43D41; Sun, 7 Mar 2004 22:06:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kuriyama@imgsrc.co.jp) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by white.imgsrc.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D65E284080; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 15:06:24 +0900 (JST) Received: from black.imgsrc.co.jp (black.imgsrc.co.jp [IPv6:2001:218:422:2::130]) by white.imgsrc.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23C6E28407C; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 15:06:23 +0900 (JST) Received: from black.imgsrc.co.jp (black.imgsrc.co.jp [IPv6:2001:218:422:2::130]) by black.imgsrc.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4A381E4622; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 15:06:22 +0900 (JST) Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2004 15:06:22 +0900 Message-ID: <7mk71vj2jl.wl@black.imgsrc.co.jp> From: Jun Kuriyama To: Kris Kennaway In-Reply-To: <20040308060320.GA58705@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <200403080558.i285wQOr026377@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040308060320.GA58705@xor.obsecurity.org> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.10.1 (Watching The Wheels) SEMI/1.14.5 (Awara-Onsen) FLIM/1.14.5 (Demachiyanagi) APEL/10.6 Emacs/21.3 (i386--freebsd) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.5 - "Awara-Onsen") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS snapshot-20020531 cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/graphics/fbm Makefile ports/math/fbm Makefile X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2004 06:06:30 -0000 At Sun, 7 Mar 2004 22:03:20 -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > I don't know that there's a whole lot of point in setting non-obvious > LATEST_LINKs..their main use is to allow pkg_add -r to work for > end-users. Users probably aren't likely to guess these values if they > want to install the port. Agreed. > In cases like this the ports should probably either both be marked > NO_LATEST_LINK, or the "most useful" port should get the LATEST_LINK > if that's easy to arbitrate. Okay, I'll use NO_LATEST_LINK if noone objects because I'm not sure which port is usable or major. -- Jun Kuriyama // IMG SRC, Inc. // FreeBSD Project