From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 28 01:47:20 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C059216A4DA for ; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 01:47:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ke.han@redstarling.com) Received: from smtp106.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com (smtp106.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.200.254]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4926243D53 for ; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 01:47:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ke.han@redstarling.com) Received: (qmail 75981 invoked from network); 28 Aug 2006 01:47:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.20?) (ke.han@redstarling.com@61.170.136.61 with plain) by smtp106.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; 28 Aug 2006 01:47:19 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20060827220002.C19869@chylonia.3miasto.net> References: <44EF0F92.80108@gmail.com> <20060827220002.C19869@chylonia.3miasto.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <47B7C4B9-BB47-48EE-A70B-9A9D6B671207@redstarling.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: ke han Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 09:47:15 +0800 To: Wojciech Puchar X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Cc: Martin Miedema , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Intel 64bit / AMD 64 bit advantage X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 01:47:20 -0000 On Aug 28, 2006, at 4:03 AM, Wojciech Puchar wrote: >> 32 vs 64 bits does not give you any raw performance boost for most >> apps. The > > yes it will. FreeBSD/amd64 works at least 10% faster than FreeBSD/ > i386 on athlon64 machine, when i386 version were recompiled for P4. > With default FreeBSD/i386 - it will be at least 30%. > > just because it's not just 64-bit addresses, but twice the > registers (r8-r15) allowing C compiler to generate more efficient > code. > > For now AMD64 is the fastest and cheapest architecture - at least > with AMD processors, not intel clones. (YES now intel makes clones > of AMD processors) I stand corrected ;-)...This is good info, thanks. However, to the original post, you will not see 10-30 % performance difference on your email or file sharing between an Intel Celeron and AMD Opteron. These types of apps are Disk and Network IO bound. Spend your money on redundancy/fail-over of hard drive and power supply. Also choosing a well regarded NIC is important. ke han > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- > unsubscribe@freebsd.org"