From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 7 16:17:45 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61B7616A422 for ; Tue, 7 Feb 2006 16:17:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from shoesoft@gmx.net) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.de [213.165.64.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E5BBF43D45 for ; Tue, 7 Feb 2006 16:17:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from shoesoft@gmx.net) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 07 Feb 2006 16:17:42 -0000 Received: from fwswe.rise-s.com (EHLO dhcp105.swe) [83.65.168.194] by mail.gmx.net (mp024) with SMTP; 07 Feb 2006 17:17:42 +0100 X-Authenticated: #16703784 From: Stefan Ehmann To: Ruslan Ermilov In-Reply-To: <20060206164629.GE87340@ip.net.ua> References: <1139238659.876.13.camel@localhost> <20060206164629.GE87340@ip.net.ua> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2006 17:17:41 +0100 Message-Id: <1139329061.724.18.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.2.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: Ian FREISLICH , Warner Losh , current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Parallel buildkernel (still) broken? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2006 16:17:45 -0000 On Mon, 2006-02-06 at 18:46 +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > On Mon, Feb 06, 2006 at 04:10:59PM +0100, Stefan Ehmann wrote: > > On Mon, 2006-02-06 at 15:30 +0200, Ian FREISLICH wrote: > > > Hi > > > > > > I was wondering if there is some fubar on my current box or if it's > > > just not possible to do parallel buildkernels. make buildworld > > > -jnn does work on this system. System is i386. > > > > > > With the parallel build it's difficult to say exactly what the > > > problem is. This is the error that I get. There are no errors > > > further up in the script at least. > > > > I get the same errors for quite some time now. But since it's easy to > > workaround, I haven't investigated/reported it yet. > > > Could you both test this and report back? Didn't work for me either. Here's a log of a failed make -j4 buildkernel: http://stud4.tuwien.ac.at/~e0125637/fbsd/buildkernel.log