From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Oct 18 13:09:26 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E50871065967
	for <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 13:09:26 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E362B8FC19
	for <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 13:09:25 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from odyssey.starpoint.kiev.ua (alpha-e.starpoint.kiev.ua
	[212.40.38.101])
	by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id QAA03140;
	Tue, 18 Oct 2011 16:09:24 +0300 (EEST)
	(envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org)
Message-ID: <4E9D7A84.3020205@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 16:09:24 +0300
From: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
	rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111003 Thunderbird/7.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Alexander Best <arundel@FreeBSD.org>
References: <20111017200129.GA13481@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <20111017200129.GA13481@freebsd.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: undefined
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: small devfs.conf patch
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 13:09:27 -0000

on 17/10/2011 23:01 Alexander Best said the following:
> hi there,
> 
> any thoughts regarding this change? with the ata subsystem dying, linking to
> /dev/acd isn't really necessary any more. also a lot of ports nowadays depend
> on /dev/dvd.

IMO, go for it.

-- 
Andriy Gapon