From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 15 15:47:22 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9320816A4CE for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2005 15:47:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mailhost.stack.nl (vaak.stack.nl [131.155.140.140]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAA4B43D46 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2005 15:47:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marcolz@stack.nl) Received: from hammer.stack.nl (hammer.stack.nl [IPv6:2001:610:1108:5010::153]) by mailhost.stack.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2CC21F05A; Tue, 15 Mar 2005 16:47:20 +0100 (CET) Received: by hammer.stack.nl (Postfix, from userid 333) id A8F726247; Tue, 15 Mar 2005 16:47:20 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 16:47:20 +0100 From: Marc Olzheim To: Dennis Berger Message-ID: <20050315154720.GA69524@stack.nl> References: <20050315153209.GA8863@nipsi.home.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="LQksG6bCIzRHxTLp" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050315153209.GA8863@nipsi.home.net> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD hammer.stack.nl 5.4-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 5.4-PRERELEASE X-URL: http://www.stack.nl/~marcolz/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Subject: Re: vfs.ufs.dirhash_maxmem is a bit low X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 15:47:22 -0000 --LQksG6bCIzRHxTLp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 04:32:09PM +0100, Dennis Berger wrote: > My request can we add white kernel message for the behavier of running ou= t of hashmemory? Like it is for running out of open files. > A message will appear on /dev/console indicating that the dirhash is too = low. > Or pointing out in tuning(9) that it should raised of servers with lots o= f files. > Or raised the default from 2MB to 10MB or something. >=20 > any comments? I'd say stuff it in tuning(7)... Marc --LQksG6bCIzRHxTLp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCNwOIezjnobFOgrERArgPAKDUex1ZV3Hs6xO/58z5F5k4gqV96QCfcODq nQ5GiyDX/sSNh/ccswrov8I= =8OAh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --LQksG6bCIzRHxTLp--