From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Dec 2 03:37:37 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id DAA09425 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Wed, 2 Dec 1998 03:37:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from pcnet1.pcnet.com (pcnet1.pcnet.com [204.213.232.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id DAA09416 for ; Wed, 2 Dec 1998 03:37:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from eischen@vigrid.com) Received: (from eischen@localhost) by pcnet1.pcnet.com (8.8.7/PCNet) id GAA17901; Wed, 2 Dec 1998 06:36:56 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 1998 06:36:56 -0500 (EST) From: Daniel Eischen Message-Id: <199812021136.GAA17901@pcnet1.pcnet.com> To: eischen@vigrid.com, nate@mt.sri.com Subject: Re: TCP bug Cc: dillon@apollo.backplane.com, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > The strange thing is that 90% of the hosts on the net work. It's those > remaining 10% that don't work for some reason. > > (The masks appear to be set correctly though, else I wouldn't be able to > get any traffic to the boxes...) If 10% of your systems didn't have correct netmasks and default gateways set, then that's exactly what you'd see. You could get traffic to them, but just no replies through the router. If you sit at the router, can you ping those systems (assuming they can be pinged)? Dan Eischen eischen@vigrid.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message