From owner-freebsd-hackers  Tue Nov  4 00:06:28 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id AAA22002
          for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 4 Nov 1997 00:06:28 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers)
Received: from dyson.iquest.net (dyson.iquest.net [198.70.144.127])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id AAA21981;
          Tue, 4 Nov 1997 00:06:12 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from toor@dyson.iquest.net)
Received: (from root@localhost)
	by dyson.iquest.net (8.8.7/8.8.5) id DAA00689;
	Tue, 4 Nov 1997 03:06:08 -0500 (EST)
From: "John S. Dyson" <toor@dyson.iquest.net>
Message-Id: <199711040806.DAA00689@dyson.iquest.net>
Subject: Re: FreeBSD shines..[Fwd: Re: semaphore speed]
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.95.971103234707.17567C-100000@current1.whistle.com> from Julian Elischer at "Nov 3, 97 11:51:03 pm"
To: julian@whistle.com (Julian Elischer)
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 1997 03:06:08 -0500 (EST)
Cc: dyson@FreeBSD.ORG, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Reply-To: dyson@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL31 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Julian Elischer said:
> 
> Actually it was a 200MHz PPro.
> the difference is that it was 2.2.2
> We seem to have slowed it down by a factor of 3 :(
>
Hmmm... :-(.  It would be interesting to figure out
what has gone wrong.

> 
> I saw the test run several times..
> it really did return in 3 seconds.
> 
Wow...

-- 
John
dyson@freebsd.org
jdyson@nc.com