From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jun  2 01:12:12 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B18016A41C
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Thu,  2 Jun 2005 01:12:12 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from john@quonix.net)
Received: from beck.quonix.net (beck.quonix.net [146.145.66.90])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01A6643D4C
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Thu,  2 Jun 2005 01:12:11 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from john@quonix.net)
Received: from [192.168.1.100] (pool-71-242-16-137.phil.east.verizon.net
	[71.242.16.137])
	by beck.quonix.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j521C6Hf087021
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Wed, 1 Jun 2005 21:12:06 -0400 (EDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v622)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <13f6e3df2305b912e42aa453570a8c55@quonix.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
To: ports@freebsd.org
From: John Von Essen <john@quonix.net>
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 21:10:00 -0400
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.622)
X-SpamAssassin-3.0.3-Score: -2.82/5.8 ALL_TRUSTED
X-MimeDefang-2.51: beck.quonix.net
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 146.145.66.90
Cc: 
Subject: iftop...
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2005 01:12:12 -0000

Ports is listed as the maintainer for this package.

I have noticed (4.10) that when you quit out of iftop (version 0.16) 
two PIDs remain in the background. If you run iftop again, another two 
PID's are left, bringing it up to four, and so on.

Eventually, after the third or fourth time, you get:

interface: fxp0
Cannot obtain hardware address on this platform
IP address is: 146.145.66.91
pcap_open_live(fxp0): (no devices found) /dev/bpf4: No such file or 
directory

This behavior doesn't exist on Linux or Solaris platform. Should I 
submit a PR, or contact iftop developers first and see what they have 
to say?

PS - I'm not subscribed to the list, so please include my address in 
your reply.

Thanks
John