Date: Tue, 29 Jun 1999 20:47:47 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com> To: "David E. Cross" <crossd@cs.rpi.edu> Cc: dillon@freebsd.org, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bug in latests NFS patches for -stable Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.990629203727.11474J-100000@current1.whistle.com> In-Reply-To: <199906291348.JAA53461@cs.rpi.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Matt,
If you agree with this patch to your patch
I'll commit the NFS fixes to 3.x
(I'll also add this change to the 4.0 version.)
*** hold/nfs_serv.c Tue Jun 22 13:37:17 1999
--- nfs_serv.c Tue Jun 29 20:42:44 1999
***************
*** 1580,1585 ****
--- 1580,1586 ----
if (error) {
nfsm_reply(NFSX_WCCDATA(v3));
nfsm_srvwcc_data(dirfor_ret, &dirfor, diraft_ret, &diraft);
+ error=0;
goto nfsmout;
}
On Tue, 29 Jun 1999, David E. Cross wrote:
> There is a small by critical error in the latest patches which causes the
> server to never transmit a response packet back to the client in certain
> conditions on a nfs create RPC. Below is the updated NFS3 patch. If
> jullian could take this for review and place it at the "official" unoffical
> URL it would be muchly appreciated :) It is a one line patch.
>
> http://www.cs.rpi.edu/~crossd/FreeBSD/nfspatch3a.diff
see above for diff
>
> --
> David Cross | email: crossd@cs.rpi.edu
> Systems Administrator/Research Programmer | Web: http://www.cs.rpi.edu/~crossd
> Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, | Ph: 518.276.2860
> Department of Computer Science | Fax: 518.276.4033
> I speak only for myself. | WinNT:Linux::Linux:FreeBSD
>
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.95.990629203727.11474J-100000>