Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2019 07:02:44 -0700 From: Adam Weinberger <adamw@freebsd.org> To: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org> Cc: Adam Weinberger <adamw@freebsd.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r491810 - in head/editors/vim: . files Message-ID: <CAP7rwcgR1LiPRV385kmxzat0cvK8-i3oJsLN8cchsbgnnz_TKA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20190201135814.GA9358@FreeBSD.org> References: <201902011354.x11Ds7Wm062685@repo.freebsd.org> <20190201135814.GA9358@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 6:58 AM Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org> wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 01, 2019 at 01:54:07PM +0000, Adam Weinberger wrote: > > New Revision: 491810 > > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/491810 > > > > Log: > > Update vim to patchlevel 865 > > > > After discussion on freebsd-ports@, switch the default UI toolkit > > from GTK2 to GTK3. There isn't a huge visual difference, so it's > > more predicated on the idea that people are more likely to have > > GTK3 already installed for other things. > > Actually, I believe it's more likely that people have GTK+2 installed, > not 3. That said, however, perhaps the best way out would be flavoring > the port so it offers both packages. I'm not sure that there's a huge benefit to offering multiple UI toolkit packages. There's not much difference between the GTK2 and the GTK3 interface. Perhaps I mischaracterized the situation; it is definitely correct to say that the discussion on freebsd-ports@ revealed nearly unanimous agreement that people would prefer GTK3 be the default. # Adam -- Adam Weinberger adamw@adamw.org // adamw@FreeBSD.org https://www.adamw.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAP7rwcgR1LiPRV385kmxzat0cvK8-i3oJsLN8cchsbgnnz_TKA>