From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 8 07:06:16 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9906106564A for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2009 07:06:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from leafy7382@gmail.com) Received: from qw-out-2122.google.com (qw-out-2122.google.com [74.125.92.24]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 958FB8FC0A for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2009 07:06:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from leafy7382@gmail.com) Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 9so5127129qwb.7 for ; Wed, 07 Jan 2009 23:06:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition; bh=pWDvDN/zjVjcMPC0CCVN1LnHjaS2ThkOgEK9Wh/kVGY=; b=CgbJd0EHcclNovdVaquDkwWhkTxzqR1eJNSW8rBBlT76jXFAT3As0scCKRClhALzfZ WOVhrtlAsViakpKfB9RLepu/Gdpc54wgv7niYylfbYKxkU5CtSijwkGG1s1lxNy76UNQ t8HJwCLciFH3cInGQc+gdlE+CrHwvgvqXq5jw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=tzewtsoeJLeGaNeMY4dOYSc7J1x6dA5MY7+KWSqmusuRdmL+waff9y6ZRYgzc477Xc dGOIcR/NYRhFa8+HSSkPf+dIm3+NtgY1RP7EofRHDe3crZFYl1mwnEtvcz4fuQlMRZZ1 q7fCbxcQwJZuBqn6I+z0jMetT7t5E7hblYOm8= Received: by 10.214.60.11 with SMTP id i11mr20866450qaa.40.1231396423928; Wed, 07 Jan 2009 22:33:43 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.214.115.6 with HTTP; Wed, 7 Jan 2009 22:33:43 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 14:33:43 +0800 From: "Jiawei Ye" To: "freebsd ports" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Incorrect portsnap snapshot? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2009 07:06:17 -0000 When trying to upgrade x11/listres, I found that it is empty. So I tried to do 'portsnap fetch extract' again from portsnap1, yet downloaded snapshot still have an incorrect GZip header for x11/listres. After csup-ping against a cvsup server, I found that the following are missing from portsnap1-generated snapshot: ports/archivers/p5-Archive-Extract ports/audio/abcde ports/audio/squeezecenter-superdatetime ports/audio/tap-plugins ports/comms/minicom ports/deskutils/gtweakui ports/devel/gauche-sdl ports/devel/libcfg ports/devel/ocaml-annexlib ports/devel/p5-Locale-Maketext-Simple ports/devel/ruby-thrift ports/devel/rubygem-rubigen ports/editors/vilearn ports/emulators/fmsx ports/emulao ports/games/bogged ports/games/hex-a-hop ports/games/hex-a-hop/files ports/games/xboard ports/games/xboard/files ports/german/ispell ports/graphics/camediaplay ports/graphics/p5-Imlib2 ports/japanese/mypaedia-fpw-package ports/japanese/ng ports/lang/libstdc++_stldoc_4.2.2 ports/mail/dk-milter ports/mail/dk-milter ports/mail/milter-skem ports/mail/mreport ports/mail/p5-Mail-SendEasy ports/mail/pgpsendmail ports/mail/pgpsendmail/pkg-plrts/misc/deco/files ports/misc/dnetc ports/misc/koffice-i18n-sk ports/multimedia/gopchop ports/net/p5-Net-Dfiles ports/net-mgmt/rancid/files ports/ports-mgmt/portbrowser ports/print/rubygem-colortools ports/science/kst ports/security/bruteforceblocker ports/security/cryptstring ports/security/f-prot-sig ports/security/p5-Crypt-OpenPGP ports/sysutils/agef ports/sysutils/agef/files ports/sysutils/p5-File-Stat-Bits ports/sysutils/userinfo ports/textproc/queequeg ports/textproc/tei-p3 ports/textproc/tei-p3 ports/www/p5-Catalyst-View-HTML-Template-Compiled ports/www/rsstail ports/www/varnish ports/www/wcol ports/x11/dzen2 ports/x11/listres -- "If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then to the end user it's a duck, and end users have made it pretty clear they want a duck; whether the duck drinks hot chocolate or coffee is irrelevant."