From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 4 10:01:03 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 659CD106566C for ; Wed, 4 Jul 2012 10:01:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jakub_lach@mailplus.pl) Received: from sam.nabble.com (sam.nabble.com [216.139.236.26]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39B008FC18 for ; Wed, 4 Jul 2012 10:01:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.236.26] (helo=sam.nabble.com) by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SmMOL-0006Ys-FQ for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 04 Jul 2012 03:01:01 -0700 Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2012 03:01:01 -0700 (PDT) From: Jakub Lach To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <1341396061467-5724110.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <7C.EB.06836.8F104FF4@smtp02.insight.synacor.com> References: <7C.EB.06836.8F104FF4@smtp02.insight.synacor.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: WITHOUT_MODULES in /etc/make.conf doesn't work X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2012 10:01:03 -0000 > Sort of a dirty trick that you have to use usb/ulpt as > opposed to ulpt, and a deficiency in the documentation. No, I'm just borderline sure that WITHOUT_MODULES works the same way as MODULES_OVERRIDE, that is it looks in top directory in /usr/src/sys/modules/ and ulpt is in /usr/src/sys/modules/usb/ulpt Speaking of RAM savings, things you would always load should be compiled in kernel, modules per design take more RAM than compiled in stuff. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/WITHOUT-MODULES-in-etc-make-conf-doesn-t-work-tp5723832p5724110.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com.