From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 13 15:45:10 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E2D816A4CE for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 15:45:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from makeworld.com (makeworld.com [198.92.228.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16AF343D3F for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 15:45:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from racerx@makeworld.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.com [127.0.0.1]) by makeworld.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 782406122 for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 09:45:09 -0600 (CST) Received: from makeworld.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (makeworld.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 34503-02 for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 09:45:07 -0600 (CST) Received: from [198.92.228.34] (racerx.makeworld.com [198.92.228.34]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by makeworld.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 683FC6121 for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 09:45:07 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <420F7616.1060309@makeworld.com> Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 09:45:26 -0600 From: Chris User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050101) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20050213145302.14A9E4BDAA@ws1-1.us4.outblaze.com> <1736042877.20050213155911@wanadoo.fr> <420F6BAF.8060304@makeworld.com> <1374659210.20050213161054@wanadoo.fr> <420F6ED9.8010301@makeworld.com> <285864121.20050213161830@wanadoo.fr> <420F70C5.60006@makeworld.com> <854574739.20050213163818@wanadoo.fr> In-Reply-To: <854574739.20050213163818@wanadoo.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by ClamAV 0.75.1/amavisd-new-2.2.1 (20041222) at makeworld.com - Isn't it ironic Subject: Re: WEIRD: telnet X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 15:45:10 -0000 Anthony Atkielski wrote: *snip* > Since the original poster is trying to connect to port 61, I assume he > is using telnet to test the service on that port, and so SSH is > irrelevant. Regardless of what you assume - the user didn't indicate the reasons for using telnet nor did he relay the reason(s) for the odd port. Don't assume - either you know, or you don't. In this case - neither of us knows. With that being said, I refuse to get into semantics. -- Best regards, Chris A fail-safe circuit will destroy others.