From owner-freebsd-current Wed Sep 4 14:23:59 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id OAA03432 for current-outgoing; Wed, 4 Sep 1996 14:23:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rocky.mt.sri.com (rocky.mt.sri.com [206.127.76.100]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id OAA03426 for ; Wed, 4 Sep 1996 14:23:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from nate@localhost) by rocky.mt.sri.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) id PAA02524; Wed, 4 Sep 1996 15:23:43 -0600 (MDT) Date: Wed, 4 Sep 1996 15:23:43 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <199609042123.PAA02524@rocky.mt.sri.com> From: Nate Williams To: rkw@dataplex.net (Richard Wackerbarth) Cc: "Jordan K. Hubbard" , terry@lambert.org, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Latest Current build failure In-Reply-To: References: Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Richard Wackerbarth writes: > >I think I'm coming around to the best "solution" of all to this, at > >least from my personal perspective, and that's to do nothing and leave > >-current exactly as it is. > > > >I'm tired out just talking about it now. :-) > > As usual, the "powers that be" refuse to either make changes or allow > others to do so. I think you give too much 'power' to the 'powers that be'. You're completely free to do anything you want. But, *FIRST* of all show a working prototype and *THEN* expect to be heralded as the hero. Put the cart before the horse, not the other way around. Nate ps. You don't have to be a 'core' member to commit to the tree, just a committer.