From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Jan 16 10:14:27 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id KAA00843 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 16 Jan 1996 10:14:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id KAA00836 Tue, 16 Jan 1996 10:14:24 -0800 (PST) From: garyj@frt.dec.com Received: from cssmuc.frt.dec.com by mail1.digital.com (5.65 EXP 4/12/95 for V3.2/1.0/WV) id AA19760; Tue, 16 Jan 1996 10:08:30 -0800 Received: from localhost by cssmuc.frt.dec.com; (5.65v3.2/1.1.8.2/14Nov95-0232PM) id AA23417; Tue, 16 Jan 1996 19:08:21 +0100 Message-Id: <9601161808.AA23417@cssmuc.frt.dec.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.4 10/10/95 To: jkh%freebsd.org@inet-gw-1.pa.dec.com Cc: hackers%freebsd.org@inet-gw-1.pa.dec.com In-Reply-To: Message from "Jordan K. Hubbard" of Tue, 16 Jan 96 09:37:56 PST. Reply-To: gjennejohn@frt.dec.com Subject: Re: kgdb.. Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 16 Jan 96 19:08:21 +0100 X-Mts: smtp Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk jkh@time.cdrom.com writes: > What's the deal with kgdb, isn't it supposed to die in favor of `gdb -k' > RSN? > > Jordan I've wondered myself why it's still in the tree. Seems to me that `gdb -k' works pretty well. Or does someone know of a reason NOT to eliminate kgdb ? --- Gary Jennejohn (work) gjennejohn@frt.dec.com (home) Gary.Jennejohn@munich.netsurf.de (play) gj@freebsd.org