From owner-dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org Thu May 20 22:49:55 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: dev-commits-ports-all@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B274D64A1F5; Thu, 20 May 2021 22:49:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zi@freebsd.org) Received: from exodus.zi0r.com (exodus.zi0r.com [71.179.14.195]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "exodus.zi0r.com", Issuer "Gandi Standard SSL CA 2" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FmQ0z4gsZz3PHT; Thu, 20 May 2021 22:49:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zi@freebsd.org) Received: from exodus.zi0r.com (syn.zi0r.com [71.179.14.194]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by exodus.zi0r.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 536386A8A81; Thu, 20 May 2021 18:49:55 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 18:49:53 -0400 From: Ryan Steinmetz To: "Sergey A. Osokin" Cc: Mark Linimon , ports-committers@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org Subject: Re: git: cc298297bc51 - main - www/nginx: Undo previous commit Message-ID: References: <202105201640.14KGe1ZO031052@gitrepo.freebsd.org> <20210520195721.GA9374@lonesome.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FmQ0z4gsZz3PHT X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 15.00]; local_wl_from(0.00)[freebsd.org]; ASN(0.00)[asn:701, ipnet:71.179.0.0/16, country:US] X-BeenThere: dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Commit messages for all branches of the ports repository List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 22:49:55 -0000 On (05/20/21 22:14), Sergey A. Osokin wrote: > >There're hundreds and hundfreds patches are available with a different >quality. Are we really on position to add all of those just because >they're not enabled by default? Really? > I'm not adding hundreds of patches. I'm re-adding one, to the more than 80 existing addons/patches/modules that are options in the www/nginx port today. Almost all of which exist because the nginx development team have not chosen to make their functionality native. I don't think there's any valid cause to single this one out. -r >-- >Sergey -- Ryan Steinmetz PGP: 9079 51A3 34EF 0CD4 F228 EDC6 1EF8 BA6B D028 46D7