From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 14:55:49 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77B7316A4CE; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 14:55:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B14543D5C; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 14:55:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vs@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (vs@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j34EtnPZ051520; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 14:55:49 GMT (envelope-from vs@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from vs@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j34Etmxn051516; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 14:55:48 GMT (envelope-from vs) Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 14:55:48 GMT From: Volker Stolz Message-Id: <200504041455.j34Etmxn051516@freefall.freebsd.org> To: kay_lehmann@web.de, vs@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org, vs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/79426: [Maintainer Update] graphics/gocr: Update from 0.39 to 0.40 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 14:55:49 -0000 Synopsis: [Maintainer Update] graphics/gocr: Update from 0.39 to 0.40 State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback State-Changed-By: vs State-Changed-When: Mon Apr 4 14:54:23 GMT 2005 State-Changed-Why: Two questions: - Wouldn't netpbm-support be useful? - Is the Tk8.4 dependency mandatory? (I really don't mind too much, though) Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->vs Responsible-Changed-By: vs Responsible-Changed-When: Mon Apr 4 14:54:23 GMT 2005 Responsible-Changed-Why: Handle this http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=79426