From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 13 10:59:44 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DED1E72 for ; Sat, 13 Sep 2014 10:59:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.made4.biz (mail.made4.biz [IPv6:2001:41d0:2:c018::1:3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60FD3AF5 for ; Sat, 13 Sep 2014 10:59:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 2a02-8428-011b-e000-0290-f5ff-fe9d-b78c.rev.sfr.net ([2a02:8428:11b:e000:290:f5ff:fe9d:b78c] helo=magellan.dumbbell.fr) by mail.made4.biz with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.83 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1XSl3O-0001Fi-88; Sat, 13 Sep 2014 12:59:42 +0200 Message-ID: <54142397.2060304@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2014 12:59:35 +0200 From: =?windows-1252?Q?Jean-S=E9bastien_P=E9dron?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lutz Bichler Subject: Re: drm-i915-hw-context.7.patch References: <4838138.9H5HhdVozA@chrysaor> In-Reply-To: <4838138.9H5HhdVozA@chrysaor> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="iJtNumJrN58iLAcOt2INlj8Sp4dSdV8bs" Cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2014 10:59:44 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --iJtNumJrN58iLAcOt2INlj8Sp4dSdV8bs Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 13.09.2014 12:53, Lutz Bichler wrote: > Hi, Hi! > is it correct that the successful path in drm_gem_find_ptr does not rel= ease=20 > "names->lock"? No, it's incorrect. Good catch! I'll update the patch soon. Thank you :) --=20 Jean-S=E9bastien P=E9dron --iJtNumJrN58iLAcOt2INlj8Sp4dSdV8bs Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJUFCOcXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ2NzA4N0ZEMUFFQUUwRTEyREJDNkE2RjAz OUU5OTc2MUE1RkQ5NENDAAoJEDnpl2Gl/ZTM9S8QAJ17tQW7uUyv9ALJmtkThDd1 PT+HAHHDhQp4O9ie2o2p/iqPVvP2feInGogTi2b+zKOhRGnqgp7Qhf8kQsH7o4Gn yogd4MfWO0mH9RvcDxvU8b9GOZjUTDdz3mHlJ+IUsPgSXbm5lVt+xknk5cEO4Mcu KH4CaG3syjNS7OYPWZRcw6+STVRtn3Tro1uvLcrjBQRWmA4U2tbG/INYk3RngjNK x/C6rH25DcL/hE61hXm1esucfi2fSxAdo2DHUy/ohqgQV32+tMOUQQi5ryN3yb6f RKHXOPYd11+xqpyyo3SJzjN2qGl0K7Rj5JKj6SXY1tjKNoguVZqwC/NfbZA1GyRl H+35DaysS0oSKUAcNJwkkoi1Ve5z/ZaYI/mkk9Rn1LJZufvRRVPLamzx0ru74JNE IO47sd0/aSQJXOBlTIvgy0U9eMizAr/gO/1WH7NLjgbSNnK6BoRSpN2JEPWK+hSv srizu7IPCOmi8VHEbffcAA2jSO3gAM1lAezENLaDmZOxcalQOurDP24iribN0/O6 JvPRhOy3tMiahcOxhvu1o91j9tH/AzA5rQMLRGbyjUjK6Vg+D86yZLE/2c8OHuOr sRZpfTtqrxRjIcapWRMw5FCqWe0bhq8dj7TFFAFdQkmXhCs/bFoKyiDJ+NYx3rBj g38UktxszPbq4rcgcykO =Nzv4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --iJtNumJrN58iLAcOt2INlj8Sp4dSdV8bs--