From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Thu Dec 10 13:46:37 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 115F39D6F5A for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 13:46:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD29E138F for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 13:46:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.86 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1a71YB-0004Pz-QO; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 14:46:27 +0100 Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 14:46:27 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Michelle Sullivan Cc: "Michael B. Eichorn" , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Jan Bramkamp Subject: Re: Periodic jobs triggering panics in 10.1 and 10.2 Message-ID: <20151210134627.GG35480@home.opsec.eu> References: <34FA7D40-8758-460D-AC14-20B21D2E3F8D@ebureau.com> <1449619470.31831.9.camel@michaeleichorn.com> <56682278.4040302@sorbs.net> <56683FC1.3050001@rlwinm.de> <5668AAB1.1080003@sorbs.net> <1449703798.4355.27.camel@michaeleichorn.com> <56697B32.7050705@sorbs.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <56697B32.7050705@sorbs.net> X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 13:46:37 -0000 Hi! > I could be recalling wrongly but I'm pretty sure a number of emails have > been seen on @freebsd.org lists that say, "don't use zfs on single > spindle machines" We do ZFS on single-spindle/SSD devices regularly. No problems as of now. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 5 years to go !