From owner-freebsd-ports Tue Mar 28 18:59:19 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from viper.lovett.com (hub.lovett.com [216.60.121.161]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99F0137BE80 for ; Tue, 28 Mar 2000 18:59:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ade@lovett.com) Received: from ade by viper.lovett.com with local (Exim 3.13 #1) id 12a8h6-000DB5-00; Tue, 28 Mar 2000 20:58:56 -0600 Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 20:58:56 -0600 From: Ade Lovett To: Mikhail Teterin Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ports/12739: New port: AT&T's DjVu Netscape plug-in Message-ID: <20000328205856.P69223@lovett.com> References: <20000328191304.D9136@argon.blackdawn.com> <200003290254.VAA00849@xxx.video-collage.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <200003290254.VAA00849@xxx.video-collage.com>; from mi@video-collage.com on Tue, Mar 28, 2000 at 09:53:57PM -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Tue, Mar 28, 2000 at 09:53:57PM -0500, mi@video-collage.com wrote: > Well, I think, that by assuming responsibilities of a licensee we do > indeed act as lunatics :-) The difference is you seem to be willing to > act as such and I don't... (' Respectfully, Having looked at the website a little further, there is no requirement to page through the license and click and accept button, unlike pretty much every other piece of "restricted" software that's also "freely available". So, in this particular case, things can stay as they stand. The other DjVu port (the run-time library) _does_ require an explicit license to be acknowledged, and will thus need to be IS_INTERACTIVE etc. -aDe -- Ade Lovett, Austin, TX. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message