Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2001 09:28:35 +0000 (GMT) From: Doug Rabson <dfr@nlsystems.com> To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: <arch@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: Proposal for the CPU interrupt API Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.33.0103160928000.47065-100000@salmon.nlsystems.com> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.010315182530.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 15 Mar 2001, John Baldwin wrote: > The end result of these changes would be this: > > intrmask_t intr_disable(void); > intrmask_t intr_enable(void); > void intr_restore(intrmask_t); > > and the code above would become this instead: > > intrmask_t foo = intr_disable(); > ... > intr_restore(foo); > > Comments, objections? Good idea. I nearly did this myself a while ago. -- Doug Rabson Mail: dfr@nlsystems.com Phone: +44 20 8348 6160 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.33.0103160928000.47065-100000>