From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 15 00:33:18 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E0B337B401; Tue, 15 Apr 2003 00:33:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.framfab.com (mail.framfab.com [217.73.2.137]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB29D43F3F; Tue, 15 Apr 2003 00:33:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fredrick.nilsson@framfab.se) Received: from sestoex01.framfab.se (sestoex01.framfab.se [157.125.1.96]) by mail.framfab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6F261F1CA; Tue, 15 Apr 2003 09:33:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: by sestoex01.framfab.se with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2656.59) id <2CJP3F54>; Tue, 15 Apr 2003 09:33:13 +0200 Message-ID: From: Fredrick Nilsson To: 'Joe Marcus Clarke' , Maxim Sobolev Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 09:33:12 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2656.59) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" cc: FreeBSD GNOME Users Subject: RE: Mozilla shouldn't force -O2 optimisation on user X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 07:33:18 -0000 i got surprised by this in a positive way. so by all means, please keep it! .f -----Original Message----- From: Joe Marcus Clarke [mailto:marcus@FreeBSD.org] Sent: Monday, April 14, 2003 21:13 To: Maxim Sobolev Cc: FreeBSD GNOME Users Subject: Re: Mozilla shouldn't force -O2 optimisation on user On Mon, 2003-04-14 at 15:09, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > Hi, > > I think that every concept of "WITHOUT_OPTIMIZE" added in > rev.1.136 of ports/www/mozilla/Makefile is wrong. No port > should force optimisation level on user - we have CFLAGS > for this and each user should be able to select any > performance/stability ratio he wants. > > IMO relevant part of 1.136 should be backed out, or possibly > turned into WITH_OPTIMIZED instead. It took me a long time to turn this on. Many people asked for it, and extensive tests showed it helped without any adverse affects. I finally borrowed the concept from www/phoenix. I'm always open to change. What say you all? Should this be reverted? Turned into WITH_MOZILLA_OPTIMIZE? Joe > > Thanks! > > -Maxim > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-gnome > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-gnome-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Joe Marcus Clarke FreeBSD GNOME Team :: marcus@FreeBSD.org http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome