From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 04:42:58 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD7627ED for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 04:42:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sola.nimnet.asn.au (paqi.nimnet.asn.au [115.70.110.159]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 328A9159 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 04:42:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sola.nimnet.asn.au (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id t0E4gntf086422; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 15:42:49 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 15:42:48 +1100 (EST) From: Ian Smith To: Greg Rivers Subject: Re: Security SSH In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20150114153706.N82172@sola.nimnet.asn.au> References: <20150112164010.GA811@mycenae.sbb.rs> <3E13CC03-7C83-4B6D-85B1-442D4014E57D@vpnc.org> <20150113173127.GA15966@knossos> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org, Paul Hoffman , Zoran Kolic X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 04:42:58 -0000 On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 14:20:20 -0600, Greg Rivers wrote: > On Tue, 13 Jan 2015, Paul Hoffman wrote: > > ...and I'm glad we're not discussing the uninformed crypto FUD that started > > this thread... > > > Agreed, we can all move on now. I only asked about this because I honestly > wanted to know what more knowledgeable people thought. I'm sorry if it > seemed like a stupid question to you. The link to the Der Spiegel article and the documents there referenced alone made this worthwhile for me. Now I know a whole 1% of not much. Thanks, Ian