From owner-cvs-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 18 00:20:02 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09C4916A4CE; Wed, 18 May 2005 00:20:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from VARK.MIT.EDU (VARK.MIT.EDU [18.95.3.179]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CA6543DD9; Wed, 18 May 2005 00:20:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from VARK.MIT.EDU (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by VARK.MIT.EDU (8.13.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j4I0FskU056447; Tue, 17 May 2005 20:15:54 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: (from das@localhost) by VARK.MIT.EDU (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j4I0FsQl056446; Tue, 17 May 2005 20:15:54 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG) Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 20:15:54 -0400 From: David Schultz To: Michael Lucas Message-ID: <20050518001554.GA56373@VARK.MIT.EDU> Mail-Followup-To: Michael Lucas , doc-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-doc@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org References: <200505121505.j4CF5c7i076426@repoman.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200505121505.j4CF5c7i076426@repoman.freebsd.org> cc: doc-committers@FreeBSD.ORG cc: cvs-doc@FreeBSD.ORG cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq book.sgml X-BeenThere: cvs-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the doc and www trees List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 00:20:02 -0000 On Thu, May 12, 2005, Michael Lucas wrote: > mwlucas 2005-05-12 15:05:38 UTC > > FreeBSD doc repository > > Modified files: > en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq book.sgml > Log: > Rewrite "math co-processor" answer to make it more clear and readable. > > Do we even run out-of-the-box on hardware without a math co-processor > these days? I believe the current answer is `yes' for ARM and `no' for all other architectures. (Technically speaking, sparc64, alpha, and ia64 are somewhere in the middle because we are able to emulate missing coprocessor features on those platforms, but that's standard behavior for those architectures.)