Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 17 May 2005 20:15:54 -0400
From:      David Schultz <das@FreeBSD.ORG>
To:        Michael Lucas <mwlucas@FreeBSD.ORG>
Cc:        cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq book.sgml
Message-ID:  <20050518001554.GA56373@VARK.MIT.EDU>
In-Reply-To: <200505121505.j4CF5c7i076426@repoman.freebsd.org>
References:  <200505121505.j4CF5c7i076426@repoman.freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, May 12, 2005, Michael Lucas wrote:
> mwlucas     2005-05-12 15:05:38 UTC
> 
>   FreeBSD doc repository
> 
>   Modified files:
>     en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq book.sgml 
>   Log:
>   Rewrite "math co-processor" answer to make it more clear and readable.
>   
>   Do we even run out-of-the-box on hardware without a math co-processor
>   these days?

I believe the current answer is `yes' for ARM and `no' for all
other architectures.  (Technically speaking, sparc64, alpha, and
ia64 are somewhere in the middle because we are able to emulate
missing coprocessor features on those platforms, but that's
standard behavior for those architectures.)



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050518001554.GA56373>