Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 11:36:33 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> To: Dejan Lesjak <lesi@FreeBSD.org> Cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/x11/XFree86-4-clients Makefile pkg-plist ports/x11/XFree86-4-clients/files manpagespatch-programs::Imakefile Message-ID: <20040823113633.GA9200@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <200408231102.i7NB29iV069761@repoman.freebsd.org> References: <200408231102.i7NB29iV069761@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Aug 23, 2004 at 11:02:09AM +0000, Dejan Lesjak wrote: > lesi 2004-08-23 11:02:09 UTC > > FreeBSD ports repository > > Modified files: > x11/XFree86-4-clients Makefile pkg-plist > x11/XFree86-4-clients/files manpages > Added files: > x11/XFree86-4-clients/files patch-programs::Imakefile > Log: > Instead of installing xterm here, depend on x11/xterm port. Taken from > xorg-clients port. BTW, since xorg-clients provide xterm (as it been for years with XFree86), what was the reason to separate xterm from it? Or is it so special client that user might want to do something about it (i.e., upgrade) separately from the rest of xorg-* ports? For me, xterm is just another reference implementation like twm, xclock, etc, taking into account that there're many other terminal emulators available in ports (aterm, eterm, konsole, etc). ./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040823113633.GA9200>