From owner-freebsd-ports  Fri Mar 14 15:36:19 1997
Return-Path: <owner-ports>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id PAA18968
          for ports-outgoing; Fri, 14 Mar 1997 15:36:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from vader.cs.berkeley.edu (vader.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.38.234])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA18861;
          Fri, 14 Mar 1997 15:35:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from asami@localhost) by vader.cs.berkeley.edu (8.8.4/8.7.3) id PAA07835; Fri, 14 Mar 1997 15:33:59 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 1997 15:33:59 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199703142333.PAA07835@vader.cs.berkeley.edu>
To: pgiffuni@fps.biblos.unal.edu.co
CC: obrien@NUXI.com, committers@FreeBSD.ORG, ports@FreeBSD.ORG
In-reply-to: <332988F3.37FF@fps.biblos.unal.edu.co> (message from Pedro Giffuni on Fri, 14 Mar 1997 09:20:51 -0800)
Subject: Re: gcc-2.7.2.2? Re: ports freeze in 9 1/2 hours
From: asami@vader.cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: owner-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

 * From: Pedro Giffuni <pgiffuni@fps.biblos.unal.edu.co>

 * OK, if g77 makes it in the base distribution, we should move f2c to the
 * ports tree, like Satoshi suggested.

Um, that's not what I meant by the reply to Peter.  I do not want any
fortran compiler in the base distribution.  They can both be ports.
(Especially since g77 is much larger than f2c....)

Satoshi