Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 4 Jan 2017 10:48:28 -0800
From:      Freddie Cash <fjwcash@gmail.com>
To:        FreeBSD Filesystems <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Check status of background destroy
Message-ID:  <CAOjFWZ55AOeURtzeOZX_oR%2BJ=exm-9pUnHi9%2BSFcVVNkxm2n3A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAGMYy3uU6bUfjufXFQXbNT2krnRnOj-YC2069ep_2tNjDJuw4A@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <CAOjFWZ4S42mebL15iT8=TLcfvabBWeUdLDzi_d3WfhKTpuGdOw@mail.gmail.com> <CAGMYy3uU6bUfjufXFQXbNT2krnRnOj-YC2069ep_2tNjDJuw4A@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 10:43 AM, Xin LI <delphij@gmail.com> wrote:

> Try setting vfs.zfs.free_max_blocks to 100000 (this is an arbitrary
> number, can be larger, limits maximum blocks being freed per txg; see
> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=3Drevision&revision=3D271532 for
> details).
>
> You can inspect the progress with DTrace by looking at zfs-dbgmsg.
>

=E2=80=8BForgot to mention, this server is running 64-bit FreeBSD 9.3-p5.=
=E2=80=8B  That
sysctl OID doesn't exist.

=E2=80=8BFrom the sounds of the comments on that revision, this would proba=
ble be a
useful feature to have.

I'll have to see about upgrading this system (there's a separate pool for
the OS), I guess.

Which FreeBSD version(s) include that feature?  Would 10.3 be okay, or
would I have to go all the way to 11.0?

Hrm, maybe I'll play with an updated mfsBSD USB stick instead, and see if
things work better with that, first.

Thanks for the info!!


--=20
Freddie Cash
fjwcash@gmail.com



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAOjFWZ55AOeURtzeOZX_oR%2BJ=exm-9pUnHi9%2BSFcVVNkxm2n3A>