Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 15:56:20 +0100 From: Florent Thoumie <flz@FreeBSD.org> To: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@des.no> Cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What can I do? Message-ID: <460A8214.3070903@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <86veglpgyk.fsf@dwp.des.no> References: <46022E59.7030407@jabbe.de> <46026D62.4010009@FreeBSD.org> <861wj9sjz6.fsf@dwp.des.no> <200703281611.01544.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> <86veglpgyk.fsf@dwp.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > Dejan Lesjak <dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> writes: >> On Wednesday 28 of March 2007, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: >>> I suspect you're way past the point where new issues show up faster >>> than you can fix them. The only way out of this tar pit is to merge >>> everything into the ports tree so other port maintainers have a real >>> incentive to help you out. >> Not quite just yet. We should at least fix trivial failures (mostly >> plist fixes) that would otherwise keep things like qt and gtk from >> building. > > Uh? I thought those had been taken care of a long time ago. > > I maintain(ed) a small Linux distro at work, and I completed the > transition to modular X.org about a year and a half ago. I appreciate > the difference in scale, but still, I'm starting to wonder if you guys > still have all your marbles. Those plist issues are mostly caused by the prefix merge, not the new X.org itself. -- Florent Thoumie flz@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD Committer [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGCoIaMxEkbVFH3PQRCk/xAJ9vw/Un8Rw35SVbc3IEq3iLhHfasgCfW8oO Qufa+kU1Iu9UBqmjzA6brKg= =1qwg -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?460A8214.3070903>