From owner-freebsd-current Wed Feb 5 09:28:22 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id JAA19886 for current-outgoing; Wed, 5 Feb 1997 09:28:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA19842 for ; Wed, 5 Feb 1997 09:28:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from time.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id JAA19966; Wed, 5 Feb 1997 09:28:06 -0800 (PST) To: Karl Denninger cc: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Karl fulminates, film at 11. In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 05 Feb 1997 09:56:20 CST." <199702051556.JAA02536@Jupiter.Mcs.Net> Date: Wed, 05 Feb 1997 09:28:06 -0800 Message-ID: <19962.855163686@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > Mail sent to an open mailing list is not private. But the mail I sent to you which you forwarded was. I don't remember a cc on -current ever being in there until you jumped onto that list with a paste-in from one of my *private* messages to you. In any case, it's not really important at this point and I will not resurrect my argument with you here. The only thing I wanted to say to -current was that the whole incident has at least had a positive effect in that it served as a much-needed goad into working on strengthening the list charters so that we can all have a much clearer set of rules to live by (and a well defined procedure for punative measures to be taken against any future offender, so there are no surprises on either side). I will have some commits to the handbook shortly which make it clear just what will and what will not be tolerated on our mailing lists. Jordan