Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 21:13:55 -0400 From: Ryan Stone <rysto32@gmail.com> To: Dieter BSD <dieterbsd@engineer.com> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mlock(2) man page errata Message-ID: <CAFMmRNzwYQzte1NPZqg2LyuODy1P8hx7WhZJYF7ZweuxiZ=MDQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20120329191735.155070@gmx.com> References: <20120329191735.155070@gmx.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 3:17 PM, Dieter BSD <dieterbsd@engineer.com> wrote: > mlock(2) says: > >> A single process can mlock() the minimum of a system-wide >> ``wired pages'' limit and the per-process RLIMIT_MEMLOCK >> resource limit. > > Shouldn't this say maximum rather than minimum? I don't think so. The minimum of the two would be the limit that you will hit first, and presumably is the point at which you cannot mlock any more pages.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAFMmRNzwYQzte1NPZqg2LyuODy1P8hx7WhZJYF7ZweuxiZ=MDQ>