From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Mar 30 01:13:56 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BFD6106564A
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 01:13:56 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from rysto32@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-wi0-f172.google.com (mail-wi0-f172.google.com
	[209.85.212.172])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30C758FC0A
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 01:13:55 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by wibhj6 with SMTP id hj6so96041wib.13
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 18:13:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:cc:content-type;
	bh=V5f866Fk+gy22ebK4dusBYsFrhgTVQ+iEUBMQDqpLbw=;
	b=oUiAKdEm2AaIW70iKoZURXrxxASY+0aBb9kjYzdRJI40I2qy9LU/H+m/P4d3/4LiRv
	a/rbHy8HNBTj7abPC5H09afXHhwV0tpVaeS/MKAbGtS4B28CJG6GszetnGUiuL1emW4c
	U7ZGsIlPLB439J2j78irqwh1PmdxtC7hDULDn7MJsDXlOzJs0YCOGHQWfnlMrF1ET0PV
	nY2WCBq1PabTJrL5Aa9ggDznOIwzkSEg75Jyv2CeUa9CxM18tOhCTMvPYep9HYYXSgjk
	NpUrkJj3xhNitYfCGGZzUKra8z5/qgVcoKPtJQokeA54K1QuVsMQhw8n4a/RmhRulpjr
	SMJg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.180.81.37 with SMTP id w5mr777295wix.16.1333070035096; Thu, 29
	Mar 2012 18:13:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.180.79.137 with HTTP; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 18:13:55 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20120329191735.155070@gmx.com>
References: <20120329191735.155070@gmx.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 21:13:55 -0400
Message-ID: <CAFMmRNzwYQzte1NPZqg2LyuODy1P8hx7WhZJYF7ZweuxiZ=MDQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ryan Stone <rysto32@gmail.com>
To: Dieter BSD <dieterbsd@engineer.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: mlock(2) man page errata
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
	<freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 01:13:56 -0000

On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 3:17 PM, Dieter BSD <dieterbsd@engineer.com> wrote:
> mlock(2) says:
>
>> A single process can mlock() the minimum of a system-wide
>> ``wired pages'' limit and the per-process RLIMIT_MEMLOCK
>> resource limit.
>
> Shouldn't this say maximum rather than minimum?

I don't think so.  The minimum of the two would be the limit that you
will hit first, and presumably is the point at which you cannot mlock
any more pages.