From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Wed Feb 12 16:52:47 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B844C23D0E4 for ; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 16:52:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@x86.ch) Received: from einstein.sui-inter.net (einstein.sui-inter.net [80.74.145.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.sui-inter.net", Issuer "DigiCert SHA2 Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48Hm0b0Fl9z4d4C for ; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 16:52:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@x86.ch) Received: from einstein.sui-inter.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by einstein.sui-inter.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8114CB1C0288; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 17:52:45 +0100 (CET) Received-SPF: pass (einstein.sui-inter.net: connection is authenticated) Received: from [213.55.224.186] ([213.55.224.186]) by webmail.x86.ch (Horde Framework) with HTTPS; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 17:52:45 +0100 Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 17:52:45 +0100 Message-ID: <20200212175245.Horde.mPav36B8bbzbnF3CVycDodP@webmail.x86.ch> From: freebsd@x86.ch To: Michael Zhilin Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: x96mini - x96max news References: <00CB1FC9-88DF-4E12-85BC-A39818D37173@x86.ch> <20200210213702.Horde.xDGLBoHTxBx0ATZfn1BvXSP@webmail.x86.ch> <20200212174706.Horde.xxpysn-CBZrKM_pP8kPvA1N@webmail.x86.ch> In-Reply-To: <20200212174706.Horde.xxpysn-CBZrKM_pP8kPvA1N@webmail.x86.ch> User-Agent: Horde Application Framework 5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; DelSp=Yes MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48Hm0b0Fl9z4d4C X-Spamd-Bar: ++++++++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of freebsd@x86.ch has no SPF policy when checking 80.74.145.25) smtp.mailfrom=freebsd@x86.ch X-Spamd-Result: default: False [8.09 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_XBL(5.00)[186.224.55.213.khpj7ygk5idzvmvt5x4ziurxhy.zen.dq.spamhaus.net : 127.0.0.4]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[186.224.55.213.khpj7ygk5idzvmvt5x4ziurxhy.zen.dq.spamhaus.net : 127.0.0.11]; IP_SCORE(0.29)[ipnet: 80.74.144.0/20(0.84), asn: 21069(0.56), country: CH(0.04)]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(0.00)[25.145.74.80.rep.mailspike.net : 127.0.0.18]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[x86.ch]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(1.00)[0.998,0]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FROM_NO_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(1.00)[1.000,0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[25.145.74.80.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:21069, ipnet:80.74.144.0/20, country:CH]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; GREYLIST(0.00)[pass,meta]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[] X-Spam: Yes X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 16:52:47 -0000   FreeBSD should be all images for Rockchips Allwinner AMLogic provide such as: http://www.invisible.ca/arm/ easy to install for ideots the future is arm popularity freebsd improved armbian is currently winning very negative !!!! we have the best programmers here let's make something of it Zitat von freebsd@x86.ch: > I tested Allwinner ARM systems > Orange Pi series > > H2 / H3 / H5 / H6 > > H2 = FreeBSD OK > H3 = Freebsd OK > H5 = Freebsd OK > H6 only Armbian > > vs > > X96: > > The quality of the x96mini and X96max is top > price top > Top performance > Top temperature > Top quality > > Commitment for X96er..: > > DNS filter > small IPFW2 firewall > LAN to LAN router > WIFI system > mini backup system HomeBK via SSH > USB ports have enough power for usb hdd > all in one > > Zitat von Michael Zhilin : > >> Both are interesting. But there is no support of AMLogic chips in >> FreeBSD at the moment. >>   So, what do you expect from such complex devices (WiFi, Eth, GPU)? >>   IMHO Eth is easiest, WiFi is complex topic, GPU is doubtful >> (actually I don't know)... >>     >>   But price is nice. It's really cheap. >> >>     On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 11:37 PM wrote: >> >>> _Have: >>> >>> USB2 and 100MB >>> >>> only armbian os >>> >>> chip s905w amlogic >>> >>> top quality >>> >>> price 25$ >>> >>> x96max is better  >>> price 40$ >>> and usb3 and 1000MB >>> >>> Adrian Gassmann >>> x86.ch[1] >>> >>>  _ > > Links: > ------[1] http://x86.ch