From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu May 28 10:29:49 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA13103 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Thu, 28 May 1998 10:29:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from mirage.nlink.com.br (mirage.nlink.com.br [200.238.120.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA12824; Thu, 28 May 1998 10:27:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from luiz@nlink.com.br) Received: from mirage.nlink.com.br (mirage.nlink.com.br [200.238.120.3]) by mirage.nlink.com.br (8.8.8/8.8.5) with SMTP id OAA08770; Thu, 28 May 1998 14:24:41 -0300 (EST) Date: Thu, 28 May 1998 14:24:41 -0300 (EST) From: Luiz de Barros To: Dennis cc: isp@FreeBSD.ORG, support@etinc.com, hardware@FreeBSD.ORG, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Cabling problems with etinc? In-Reply-To: <199805281525.LAA02507@etinc.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I have everything working ok at 64Kbps on other connection and a Cyclades connected to a Cisco on the other side at 256Kbps. I would like to connect Etinc instead of cyclades here and it does not work. Luiz On Thu, 28 May 1998, Dennis wrote: > At 09:34 AM 5/28/98 -0300, Luiz de Barros wrote: > >Dear ALL, > > > >We purchased an Etinc 5025PQ PCI quad syncronous E1/T1/Fractional card and > >are havind a few problems putting it to work with more than 64Kbps. > >We have a 256Kbps fractional E1 link provided by the TELCO via an HDSL > >Termination Unit and a G.703 to V.35 E1 converter. > > You say "greater than 64kbs...does that imply that you have it working at > lower > speeds or on some other connection? If so, there is no difference for the > higher > speed...you should use EXACTLY the same settings. the board uses the same > setting @ 64kbs and 2Mbs. > > > >We would like to make a FreeBSD router, connecting our various networks > >and holding our connection to internet. > > > >The whole setup works fine with a cisco on the other side and IBM, Cisco > >and Cyclades routers here at our ISP (Same CSU/DSU cable, connecting the > >V.35 cable with the V.35 DTE cable from the router ). Etinc keeps saying > >it is a clable problem, CSU/DSU problem, but how does it work with any > >router? > > > >I configured etinc port to PPP, HDLC, internal, external clock, changed > >ifconfig parameters according to the manual and i am not being able to put > >the link up and IP packets going from one side to the other at 256Kbps. > > > >I purchased etinc because of good recomendations here on the list but as i > >could see, the support from etinc is not as good as it should be. Did > >anybody already experienced any similar situation? Do i need to change > >etinc's cable? Does anybody know of any other card that can work in this > >situation? > > > >I have heard of many other choices of Sync cards and maybe next time i > >will use another card, that can give me support to work with more than > >64Kbps. I used to recomend etinc to my friends because of its support to > >FreeBSD, a Robust system with full support from the developers, etc but > >now i am quite disappointed with etinc's support. > > > >Luiz > > > > > > > > > > > > > >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > >with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message