From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 10 14:22:56 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF7ED1065681; Thu, 10 Jul 2008 14:22:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@t-b-o-h.net) Received: from vjofn.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:1f00:ffff::5e5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8559D8FC18; Thu, 10 Jul 2008 14:22:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@t-b-o-h.net) Received: from himinbjorg.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com (cpe-24-161-6-139.hvc.res.rr.com [24.161.6.139]) (authenticated bits=0) by vjofn.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m6AEMjvx080617; Thu, 10 Jul 2008 10:22:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: from himinbjorg.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com (localhost.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com [127.0.0.1]) by himinbjorg.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m6AEMeKt095415; Thu, 10 Jul 2008 10:22:40 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from ml@t-b-o-h.net) Received: (from tbohml@localhost) by himinbjorg.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com (8.13.8/8.13.6/Submit) id m6AEMeMI095414; Thu, 10 Jul 2008 10:22:40 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from tbohml) From: "Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET" Message-Id: <200807101422.m6AEMeMI095414@himinbjorg.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com> To: koitsu@FreeBSD.org (Jeremy Chadwick) Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 10:22:40 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <20080710141023.GA70961@eos.sc1.parodius.com> X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL8] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org, Edwin Groothuis , "Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET" Subject: Re: [freebsd-stable] Re: BIND update? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 14:22:57 -0000 > > On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 10:03:24AM -0400, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 12:25:33PM +0200, Oliver Brandmueller wrote: > > > > OK, thanx for clarification. I totally overlooked the updated bind port; > > > > anyhow, I use base system bind and didn't plan to change that (although > > > > it might me a good idea, as this situation clearly shows). > > > > > > You can always use the WITH_REPLACE_BASE option in the port to > > > overwrite the base system named, or use the differences in the > > > extracted tarball of 9.5.0 vs 9.5.0-P1 to update the source of the > > > base one yourself. > > > > > Shouldn't you also add : > > > > NO_BIND= true # do not build BIND > > > > into /etc/make.conf if you do, so it doesn't get clobbered? > > That would be WITHOUT_BIND=true in /etc/src.conf on RELENG_7 and later, > just for added clarification. > Thanks for the catch. I was looking at a 5.5 system I was doing that on. I haven't replaced base on my 7.0's, those were only changes to /etc/rc.conf for named_program="/usr/local/sbin/named". Tuc/TBOH