From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Sep 16 09:38:41 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA09423 for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Wed, 16 Sep 1998 09:38:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from ns.mt.sri.com (sri-gw.MT.net [206.127.105.141]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA09388 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 1998 09:38:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nate@mt.sri.com) Received: from mt.sri.com (rocky.mt.sri.com [206.127.76.100]) by ns.mt.sri.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id KAA05702; Wed, 16 Sep 1998 10:37:53 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from nate@rocky.mt.sri.com) Received: by mt.sri.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id KAA11953; Wed, 16 Sep 1998 10:37:52 -0600 Date: Wed, 16 Sep 1998 10:37:52 -0600 Message-Id: <199809161637.KAA11953@mt.sri.com> From: Nate Williams MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: rse@engelschall.com Cc: Nate Williams , freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Apache13-modssl port failures In-Reply-To: <19980916181012.C26269@engelschall.com> References: <199809160457.WAA09306@mt.sri.com> <19980916124950.A1225@engelschall.com> <199809161510.JAA11433@mt.sri.com> <19980916181012.C26269@engelschall.com> X-Mailer: VM 6.34 under 19.16 "Lille" XEmacs Lucid Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > > > > Dies at startup time with something to the effect of: > > > > > > > > Missing reference libproxy.so(_SSLv23_client_method()) ... > > > As a workaround you can use --disable-shared=proxy, of course. > > Do I need to disable the shared proxy? What do I lose by doing that? > > You only have to disable the "shared" (= DSO) on mod_proxy, but not mod_proxy > itself, of course. You lose nothing except the fact that your httpd is a > little bigger in size. Ahh, I understand. Shared in this case means 'shared library'. I apologize for the confusion, I'm a WWW server newbie. :) Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message