From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 18 16:29:27 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC2B316A41C for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2005 16:29:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.208.78.105]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EA8E43D48 for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2005 16:29:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j5IGTRQi055674; Sat, 18 Jun 2005 09:29:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.13.4/8.13.1/Submit) id j5IGTNtH055673; Sat, 18 Jun 2005 09:29:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2005 09:29:23 -0700 From: Steve Kargl To: "O. Hartmann" Message-ID: <20050618162922.GE55448@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <42B409A7.5020909@mail.uni-mainz.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <42B409A7.5020909@mail.uni-mainz.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 6.0-Current and gcc 4.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2005 16:29:27 -0000 On Sat, Jun 18, 2005 at 01:46:47PM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote: > > As I see in the sources, FreeBSD 6.0-Current is still based on gcc > 3.4.4. I think due to code freezing this version will be the platform > compiler when 6.0-RELEASE comes out. Are there any plans using a more > recent version of gcc, like 4.0 or 4.1? On some lists I read something > about better support of the features of AMD64/EM64T architectures, > especially SSE3. > It's David O'Brien and Kan's call, but I would recommend against the use of gcc 4.0.0. GCC is in the process of (early) release of 4.0.1 due to serious bugs affecting compilation of C++ and KDE. -- Steve