From owner-freebsd-current Tue Aug 29 14:55:12 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from Stalker.alfacom.net (Stalker.Alfacom.net [62.244.36.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 461E637B42C for ; Tue, 29 Aug 2000 14:55:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kushnir1.kiev.ua (dup-95.alfacom.net [62.244.36.95]) by Stalker.alfacom.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA26791 for ; Wed, 30 Aug 2000 00:55:05 +0300 (EEST) Received: from localhost (volodya@localhost) by kushnir1.kiev.ua (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e7TLswi22947 for ; Wed, 30 Aug 2000 00:55:00 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from volodya@kushnir1.kiev.ua) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 00:54:58 +0300 (EEST) From: Vladimir Kushnir To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: KLDs and DEVFS? Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello, Perhaps it is a temporary means, but for several KLDs depending on opt_devfs.h it is produced as bugus header ("touch opt_devfs.h"). So those KLDs doesn't actually work with DEVFS. Wouldn't it make sence to add kernel compilation directory to include path for them instead? Actually, this way one can propagate other options from kernel to modules as well. Regards, Vladimir -- ===========================|======================= Vladimir Kushnir | vkushnir@Alfacom.net | Powered by FreeBSD kushnir@ap3.bitp.kiev.ua | To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message