From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon May 12 19:54:26 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id TAA23918 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 12 May 1997 19:54:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from apolo.biblos.unal.edu.co ([168.176.37.75]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA23913 for ; Mon, 12 May 1997 19:54:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from unalmodem.usc.unal.edu.co (unalmodem00.usc.unal.edu.co [168.176.3.30]) by apolo.biblos.unal.edu.co (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id VAA05986; Mon, 12 May 1997 21:57:16 -0500 (COT) Message-ID: <3377F32D.10DB@fps.biblos.unal.edu.co> Date: Mon, 12 May 1997 21:50:53 -0700 From: "Pedro F. Giffuni" Organization: Universidad Nacional de Colombia X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (Win16; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tom Samplonius CC: Chuck Robey , hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: GNU is not tar References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Tom Samplonius wrote: > > BSD tar was discarded with 4.4, and "replaced" with pax. BSDI 2.1 > hardlinks tar to pax. > Thanks for the hint. The GNU tar bug must be something very stupid, one notation is accepted and the other isn't (something like this): tar -cbf filename.tar 10 * Doesn't work ! tar --create --file filename.tar --blocksize 10 * works! regards, --Pedro. > Tom