From owner-freebsd-arch  Fri Oct 26 10:50:19 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from marlborough.cnchost.com (marlborough.concentric.net [207.155.248.14])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AC4B37B403
	for <arch@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri, 26 Oct 2001 10:50:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bitblocks.com (adsl-209-204-185-216.sonic.net [209.204.185.216])
	by marlborough.cnchost.com
	id NAA29175; Fri, 26 Oct 2001 13:50:10 -0400 (EDT)
	[ConcentricHost SMTP Relay 1.14]
Message-ID: <200110261750.NAA29175@marlborough.cnchost.com>
To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>,
	Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: 64 bit times revisited.. 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 26 Oct 2001 10:48:10 PDT."
             <200110261748.NAA22627@rodney.cnchost.com> 
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 10:50:10 -0700
From: Bakul Shah <bakul@bitblocks.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-arch.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-arch>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-arch>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

I wrote:
> need it in some form.  So, just like ascii (char) and unicode
> (wchar_t), why define a _new_ time type and insist people
> start using that for new software?  Then the current time_t
> is valid only in the first "epoch".

The second line should be:

(wchar_t), why not define a _new_ time type and insist people

Sorry!

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message