Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 10:50:10 -0700 From: Bakul Shah <bakul@bitblocks.com> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>, Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 64 bit times revisited.. Message-ID: <200110261750.NAA29175@marlborough.cnchost.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 26 Oct 2001 10:48:10 PDT." <200110261748.NAA22627@rodney.cnchost.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I wrote: > need it in some form. So, just like ascii (char) and unicode > (wchar_t), why define a _new_ time type and insist people > start using that for new software? Then the current time_t > is valid only in the first "epoch". The second line should be: (wchar_t), why not define a _new_ time type and insist people Sorry! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200110261750.NAA29175>