From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Oct 16 12:19:41 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from guru.mired.org (okc-65-31-203-60.mmcable.com [65.31.203.60]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 16A0637B403 for ; Tue, 16 Oct 2001 12:19:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 5920 invoked by uid 100); 16 Oct 2001 19:19:38 -0000 From: Mike Meyer MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15308.34890.532567.881956@guru.mired.org> Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 14:19:38 -0500 To: Cc: Subject: Re: "/ was not properly dismounted" is it good or bad with softupdates on ? In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: VM 6.90 under 21.1 (patch 14) "Cuyahoga Valley" XEmacs Lucid X-face: "5Mnwy%?j>IIV\)A=):rjWL~NB2aH[}Yq8Z=u~vJ`"(,&SiLvbbz2W`;h9L,Yg`+vb1>RG% *h+%X^n0EZd>TM8_IB;a8F?(Fb"lw'IgCoyM.[Lg#r\ Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Andrey Deryugin types: > Hi All, > > I asked before about "/ was not properly dismounted" with softupdates "on" > but nobody answer how to fix it. May be it isn't so badly ? "/ was not properly dismounted" is *always* bad. Avoid it. With softupdates vs. the default mount, you are less likely to have the directory structure on the disk corrupted. You are no less likely to have data in files corrupted. Does that answer your question? http://www.mired.org/home/mwm/ Q: How do you make the gods laugh? A: Tell them your plans. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message