Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 01 Feb 2017 23:49:17 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 216607] lang/gcc fails to build on 11-stable sparc64
Message-ID:  <bug-216607-13-HriMsJaJnV@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-216607-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-216607-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D216607

Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@FreeBSD.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |gerald@FreeBSD.org
              Flags|maintainer-feedback?(gerald |
                   |@FreeBSD.org)               |
           Assignee|gerald@FreeBSD.org          |freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.
                   |                            |org
             Status|New                         |Open

--- Comment #1 from Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@FreeBSD.org> ---
(In reply to Sean Bruno from comment #0)
> We have exactly 1 sparc64 machine left in the freebsd cluster and I just=
=20
> updated it to 11-STABLE.  The build of lang/gcc seems to fail, but I'm
> not sure that we care. :-)

Full transparency:  I believe we should not care.  That may be close
to the only FreeBSD/sparc64 machine left running anywhere ;-), and it's
not SPARC machines are on the rise or anything.

That said, I just filed PR 216707 to update lang/gcc from GCC 4.9 to 5,
and, depending how tough that turns out, hope we can even go to GCC 6
later this year.  That seems energy better spent, and may eventually
benefit sparc64 even...

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-216607-13-HriMsJaJnV>